'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]' ------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { f(x, y) -> g(x, y) , g(h(x), y) -> h(f(x, y)) , g(h(x), y) -> h(g(x, y))} Details: We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs: { f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} The usable rules are: {} The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges: {f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y))} ==> {g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} {f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y))} ==> {g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y))} {g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y))} ==> {f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y))} {g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} ==> {g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} {g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} ==> {g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y))} We consider the following path(s): 1) { f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] g(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] h(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] c_0(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] g^#(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: { f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} Weak Rules: {} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y))} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y))} Details: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] g(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] h(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [8] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] g^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules { g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} and weakly orienting the rules {f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: { g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y))} Details: Interpretation Functions: f(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] g(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] h(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] f^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] g^#(x1, x2) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_2(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: { g^#(h(x), y) -> c_1(f^#(x, y)) , g^#(h(x), y) -> c_2(g^#(x, y)) , f^#(x, y) -> c_0(g^#(x, y))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules